Full article

Work–Life Balance in the Legal Profession

Challenges and Opportunities for a Transforming Sector

Work–life balance has become one of the major challenges within the legal profession. Unlike other sectors, the field of law has traditionally been characterized by long working hours, high levels of demand, constant availability, and pressure associated with procedural deadlines and immediate client attention. However, social evolution, progress in gender equality and the rise of digitalization have driven a profound shift in the way legal work is carried out. Work–life balance is no longer seen as a privilege but as a structural requirement to ensure professional well-being, talent retention and the sustainability of legal practice itself. This article examines the factors that shape work–life balance in the legal sector, the recent advances achieved and the opportunities ahead for improving the future of the profession.

The traditional culture of the legal sector

For decades, the legal sector has developed a work model based on absolute availability and constant presence. This culture includes long and unpredictable working hours, heavy caseloads, internal competitiveness, strict procedural deadlines and a deeply rooted notion that productivity is measured in hours worked rather than in results achieved. This dynamic greatly affects work–life balance, making it difficult to organize personal time and limiting the ability to fulfil family responsibilities such as childcare, caring for dependents or managing the household. In addition, the traditional distribution of caregiving roles has meant that women legal professionals disproportionately bear the burden of reconciling both spheres, which partly explains the gap in leadership positions within law firms, the judiciary or the prosecution service. Although the sector has progressed in formal equality, its workplace culture has long been one of the main obstacles to real and effective work–life balance.

Recent progress towards greater balance

Digitalization of legal activity: The incorporation of digital tools has significantly reduced the need for physical presence in law firms and courts. Electronic filing, remote hearings, electronic signatures and cloud-based document management platforms have allowed professionals to reorganize their time and work with greater autonomy. Remote work and hybrid models: After the pandemic, many firms and institutions adopted mixed systems that combine in-person and remote work. This has reduced travel time, offered more flexible schedules and made it easier to balance family and professional responsibilities. New internal policies in firms and institutions: Increasingly, legal organizations are implementing work–life balance measures such as compact schedules, extended maternity and paternity leave, adjusted hours for childcare or dependent care, well-being programs and psychological support, and work structures that allow more autonomy without penalizing career progression. Shared responsibility and cultural change: There is a growing trend towards shared responsibility between men and women. More male professionals are requesting leave, temporary reductions in working hours or flexible arrangements to fulfil family responsibilities, helping to dismantle gender stereotypes and distribute caregiving roles more evenly.

Persistent challenges to achieving balance in the legal field

Unpredictable workload: Legal practice is marked by procedural deadlines, urgencies, unforeseen court requirements and the need to respond immediately to clients, all of which make family planning difficult. Gender gap in leadership positions: Although women make up the majority in law schools, their presence decreases significantly in senior roles due to the accumulated impact of maternity, unequal caregiving responsibilities and rigid work models. Emotional strain and professional stress: Lawyers and other legal professionals frequently handle intense conflicts, emotionally complex situations and significant responsibilities. This generates stress, exhaustion and difficulty disconnecting, which affects work–life balance not only in terms of time, but also in terms of mental health. Persistent stigma surrounding flexibility: In certain legal environments—particularly in large firms or high-litigation areas—there remains a perception that requesting flexible work measures may harm career progression. This discourages the use of legally recognized rights and slows real progress toward equality.

Opportunities for a more sustainable future

The legal sector has substantial opportunities to move toward a more balanced and human-centred model. Promoting productivity based on objectives, rather than hours worked, would allow the assessment of real performance without requiring constant physical presence. Strengthening stable hybrid working models would reinforce responsible remote work without compromising service quality. Implementing equality and shared-responsibility policies would ensure that both men and women feel supported when requesting leave or adjusted schedules, without fear of negative repercussions. Developing training in time management and self-care would help prevent professional burnout. Introducing more efficient digital systems would reduce administrative burdens and free up time for personal life. Finally, driving deep cultural change, where work–life balance is seen as a right and a long-term strategic value, would help attract and retain talent, improve the quality of legal work and make the profession more sustainable for future generations.

Conclusion

Work–life balance in the legal profession remains a structural challenge, but also an opportunity to transform the sector into a more modern, equitable and efficient field. Recent progress shows that it is possible to combine professional excellence with personal well-being. The challenge for the future is to consolidate a legal culture that values quality over mere presence, promotes shared responsibility and integrates digitalization as a tool for a more humane professional life. Achieving balance is not a reduction in productivity: it is an investment in a sustainable legal sector capable of offering higher-quality services while protecting the well-being of those who make justice possible.