A solution to end the long waiting times of traditional trials
Summary Judgments: the best way to achieve judicial agility
In the dynamic world of justice, where time is a valuable resource, summary judgment motions have emerged as a powerful legal tool. These procedures allow disputes to be resolved quickly and efficiently, offering an alternative to lengthy trials. However, their use also raises questions of fairness and the full administration of justice.
The application for summary judgment is based on the premise that, in certain cases, a full trial is not necessary to reach a fair decision. This mechanism seeks to address obvious and clear-cut disputes, where the facts are undisputed and the evidence is compelling. The objective is to avoid the burden of protracted trials when the resolution is clear from the outset.
One of the main advantages of summary trials is the speed of dispute resolution. Compared to conventional court proceedings, which can take months or even years, summary trials offer a fast track to a decision. This benefits both the parties involved and the court system, reducing the workload and associated costs.
In addition, the efficiency of summary trials fosters confidence in the legal system by providing quick responses to the parties. This is especially valuable in cases where time is critical, such as in commercial disputes or emergency situations.