Full article

Conflicts of Interest in the Legal Profession: The Thin Line Between Power and Duty

A Reflection on Ethics, Trust, and the Limits of Professional Independence.

A conflict of interest is one of the most delicate dilemmas in legal practice. It arises when a lawyer faces a situation where their duty of loyalty to a client may be compromised by other relationships, interests, or benefits. It is not always visible: sometimes it hides in prior dealings, shared financial interests, or personal ties that can affect professional independence.

Independence is the foundation of credibility in the legal profession. A lawyer cannot serve two opposing interests without risking their integrity. Their role is not only technical but ethical: they are a guardian of trust, not merely a provider of legal services. A conflict of interest therefore undermines the very essence of the profession, as it raises doubts about the lawyer’s true motivations.

Conflicts can take various forms: simultaneous, when representing opposing interests; successive, when assisting a new client against a former one; personal, when family or emotional ties exist; or potential, when a conflict may arise in the future. In all cases, transparency and honesty are essential.

Prevention is the most effective tool. Before accepting a case, a lawyer should reflect on prior relationships, economic ties, and possible incompatibilities. If there is reasonable doubt, abstention is the right decision. Declining a case for ethical reasons is not a weakness but a sign of professional maturity and respect for the trust clients place in their counsel.

In collective law firms, conflicts can extend across the team. Responsible firms implement detection systems — known as “conflict checks” — to ensure that one case does not compromise another lawyer’s independence. Independence is not diminished by teamwork; it is shared and collectively safeguarded.

Ignoring a conflict can have serious consequences, from disciplinary sanctions to loss of reputation. Yet the greatest harm is the loss of moral authority. Trust is built with consistency and can be destroyed by a single act of disloyalty. The ethical lesson is clear: legal practice is not measured by the number of cases won but by the integrity with which cases are chosen and conducted.

Accepting or rejecting a case is not merely a professional choice; it is a moral one. A lawyer may have the right to act, but not always the duty. Between “can” and “should” lies the true core of legal ethics. The lawyer who understands this distinction does not just practice law — they honor it.