20 leading lawyers in Constitutional Law in Germany in 2026
Impact Lawyers’ editorial selection brings together twenty professionals with particularly significant experience in this field in Germany. Lawyers are listed alphabetically by first name; the order of the table does not establish internal positions or imply that one professional is superior to another.
| Lawyer | Firm | Main profile |
|---|---|---|
| Christian Johann | Redeker Sellner Dahs | Constitutional and public law |
| Cosima Baumeister | Gleiss Lutz | Public regulation and state organisation |
| Daniel Couzinet | Gleiss Lutz | Constitutional and public law |
| Daniel Krebühl | Redeker Sellner Dahs | Fundamental rights and judicial review |
| Hanna Becher | Gleiss Lutz | Fundamental rights and judicial review |
| Jacob von Andreae | Gleiss Lutz | EU law and constitutional litigation |
| Katja Lehr | Gleiss Lutz | Public regulation and state organisation |
| Korbinian Reiter | Redeker Sellner Dahs | EU law and constitutional litigation |
| Lars Kindler | Gleiss Lutz | Constitutional and public law |
| Linda Erdmann | Gleiss Lutz | Fundamental rights and judicial review |
| Lisa Kappler | Gleiss Lutz | EU law and constitutional litigation |
| Marc Ruttloff | Gleiss Lutz | Public regulation and state organisation |
| Matthias Ganske | Redeker Sellner Dahs | Public regulation and state organisation |
| Matthias Kottmann | Redeker Sellner Dahs | Constitutional and public law |
| Michael Uechtritz | Gleiss Lutz | Constitutional and public law |
| Nena Husemann | Gleiss Lutz | Fundamental rights and judicial review |
| Sandra Plötz | Gleiss Lutz | EU law and constitutional litigation |
| Ulrich Karpenstein | Redeker Sellner Dahs | Fundamental rights and judicial review |
| Wolfgang Roth | Redeker Sellner Dahs | EU law and constitutional litigation |
| Xiao Chen | Gleiss Lutz | Public regulation and state organisation |
How the ranking was prepared
The selection has been prepared through an independent editorial analysis and an overall assessment of the career, specialisation, experience and professional recognition of the lawyers included. Multiple sources of information have been taken into account, including the websites of the professionals themselves and their firms, news and publications appearing in the media, matters and transactions in which they have been involved, their academic and institutional activity, their national and international profile, and references within the legal and business community.
Particular attention has also been paid to the perception of clients and professionals familiar with their work, assessing factors such as the trust they inspire, responsiveness, legal judgement, effectiveness in resolving matters and the recognition achieved within their respective areas of specialisation. The result reflects a combined editorial assessment of objective and qualitative factors, designed to capture not only career track record and technical knowledge, but also the prestige and professional standing each lawyer has consolidated through legal practice.
How to interpret the selection
The ranking is an editorial snapshot of the German legal market based on information available in 2026. It does not measure fees, guarantee outcomes or claim that any included professional is the right choice for every matter. The choice of counsel should take into account the precise specialty, potential conflicts of interest, jurisdiction, availability, language, budget and relationship of trust.
