20 leading constitutional law lawyers in Italy in 2026
Impact Lawyers' editorial selection brings together twenty professionals with particularly significant experience in constitutional law in Italy. Lawyers are listed alphabetically by surname: the table order does not establish internal positions or identify one professional as superior to another.
| Lawyer | Firm | Main profile |
|---|---|---|
| Aldo Sandulli | Professional and academic practice | Constitutional litigation and fundamental rights |
| Alfonso Celotto | Studio Legale Celotto / SI – Studio Inzaghi | Constitutional review, public freedoms and institutions |
| Angelo Clarizia | Clarizia & Associati | High-level public litigation and institutional matters |
| Anna Romano | Satta Romano & Associati | High-level public litigation and institutional matters |
| Antonio Lirosi | Gianni & Origoni | Constitutional review, public freedoms and institutions |
| Aristide Police | Police & Partners | Constitutional review, public freedoms and institutions |
| Claudio Guccione | Guccione e Associati | Constitutional litigation and fundamental rights |
| Fabio Baglivo | Gianni & Origoni | Constitutional litigation and fundamental rights |
| Fabio Cintioli | Cintioli & Associati | Constitutional litigation and fundamental rights |
| Filippo Satta | Satta Romano & Associati | Public economic law and constitutional regulation |
| Francesco Goisis | Baker McKenzie | High-level public litigation and institutional matters |
| Giulio Napolitano | Professional and academic practice | High-level public litigation and institutional matters |
| Giuseppe Morbidelli | Professional and academic practice | Public economic law and constitutional regulation |
| Guido Reggiani | Gianni & Origoni | Public economic law and constitutional regulation |
| Luca Raffaello Perfetti | Professional and academic practice | Constitutional litigation and fundamental rights |
| Luisa Torchia | Studio Legale Torchia | High-level public litigation and institutional matters |
| Marcello Clarich | Studio Legale Clarich | Public economic law and constitutional regulation |
| Marco Dugato | Professional and academic practice | Public economic law and constitutional regulation |
| Piero Sandulli | Professional and academic practice | Constitutional review, public freedoms and institutions |
| Stefano Cunico | Gianni & Origoni | Constitutional review, public freedoms and institutions |
How the ranking was prepared
This selection was built from scratch through Impact Lawyers’ own editorial review of professional and public information available through 2026. It does not reproduce or adapt the order of third-party directories, awards or rankings. Profiles were identified and cross-checked using current professional biographies, official law-firm information, publicly verifiable matters and transactions, publications, institutional and academic activity and international experience.
For this practice area, particular attention was paid to constitutional litigation, fundamental rights, constitutional review, public freedoms and institutional matters.
The editorial assessment combines five dimensions:
- Depth, continuity and genuine specialisation in the practice: 30%.
- Complexity and relevance of publicly verifiable matters, transactions or responsibilities: 25%.
- Technical command and ability to handle complex matters within the specialty: 20%.
- Professional leadership, independent judgement and ability to lead significant mandates: 15%.
- International profile and doctrinal, academic or institutional contribution: 10%.
Impact Lawyers' own editorial approach
Inclusion does not depend on firm size, media visibility or presence in other rankings. The selection is intended to reflect different practice models, combining major firms, specialist boutiques and professionals with a particularly distinctive individual track record. The apparent number of wins, transactions or clients is not used as an automatic measure because public information is uneven and many matters remain confidential.
How to interpret the selection
This ranking is an editorial snapshot of the market based on public information available in 2026. It does not measure fees, guarantee outcomes or claim that any included professional is the right choice for every matter. The choice of counsel should take into account the precise specialty, potential conflicts of interest, jurisdiction, availability, language, budget and relationship of trust.
Professional careers and firm structures can change. Future editions should therefore verify partner moves, new firms, changes of role and potential incompatibilities before publication.
