14 December 2020
News
Free

How to manage conflicts based on personal relationships

The American Bar Association Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility released today detailed recommendations for how lawyers should assess and respond to potential conflicts arising from client representation and relationships with opposing lawyers.

Formal Opinion 494 explores three categories of relationships — acquaintances, friendships and close personal relationships — to assist lawyers in determining what, if any, conflicts exist under ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 1.7(a)(2). The new opinion draws heavily from Formal Opinion 488, issued in September 2019, which addresses judges’ personal relationships with lawyers or parties that might require disqualification or disclosure.

Formal Opinion 494 is explicit in saying that intimate relationships “must be disclosed” and asserts that “lawyers ordinarily may not represent clients in the matter, unless each client gives informed consent confirmed in writing.”

“Because friendships exist in a wide variety of contexts, friendships need to be examined closely,” the opinion continued. “Close friendships with opposing counsel should be disclosed to clients and, where appropriate … their informed consent, confirmed in writing, obtained. … By contrast, some friendships and most relationships that fall into the category of acquaintances need not be disclosed, nor is clients’ informed consent required.” Still, the formal opinion suggests disclosure of such situations “may be advisable to maintain good client relations.”

The formal opinion was developed this summer by the ABA Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility, which periodically issues ethics opinions to guide lawyers, courts and the public in interpreting and applying ABA model ethics rules to specific issues of legal practice, client-lawyer relationships and judicial behavior. Recent ABA ethics opinions are available on the ABA Center for Professional Responsibility website.

Read here the Formal Opinion 494 paper.

Copyright © The Impact Lawyers. All rights reserved. This information or any part of it may not be copied or disseminated in any way or by any means or downloaded or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of The Impact Lawyers. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the positions or policies of The Impact Lawyers.
Newsletter

Would you like to read more?

The Impact Lawyers offers a FREE newsletter that keeps you up to date on news and analysis about the international latest legal news.
Please complete the form below and click on subscribe to receive The Impact Lawyers Newsletter subscription

2
x
Subscribe for free

The Impact Lawyers Newsletter

  • Practical templates and guides for lawyers and law firms
  • Podcasts, videos and webinars explaining how to be sucessful
  • Tips made by lawyers and other practitioners